Someone else decides what your life is worth
You believe you determine your own value. This is perhaps the most persistent delusion of modern individualism. In reality, your worth has been calculated, categorized, and commodified by systems you’ll never directly encounter.
──── The Actuarial Assignment
Insurance companies know your exact monetary value before you’ve even applied for coverage. Age, occupation, health metrics, geographic location, credit score—these data points feed into algorithms that output a precise numerical assessment of your life’s worth.
This isn’t metaphorical. When you die, this is literally the amount paid out. The calculation has been made. Your life has been priced.
The sophisticated part isn’t the calculation itself—it’s how this valuation becomes internalized as natural law. You begin to see yourself through the actuarial lens: worth less at 60 than 30, worth less with pre-existing conditions than without, worth less in certain zip codes than others.
──── Employment as Value Arbitration
Your employer doesn’t pay you what you’re worth. They pay you the minimum amount required to prevent you from leaving, calculated against the cost of replacing you.
This creates a perverse dynamic where your perceived value becomes tied to your replaceability. The more unique your skills, the higher your valuation. The more standardized your function, the lower your worth.
But here’s the critical insight: this valuation system has nothing to do with your actual contribution to human flourishing. A hedge fund manager who extracts wealth from productive enterprises may be valued higher than a teacher who educates children or a nurse who saves lives.
The market doesn’t measure value—it measures leverage.
──── Algorithmic Worth Assessment
Dating apps reduce you to a swipe-ability score based on photo quality and written appeal. Credit agencies assign you a numerical representation of trustworthiness. Social media platforms calculate your engagement value to advertisers.
Each system creates its own valuation framework, and collectively they form a comprehensive assessment of your social worth. The devastating part is how these external valuations begin to shape your self-perception.
You start optimizing for metrics you didn’t choose, pursuing validation from systems designed to extract value from you, not determine your actual worth.
──── The Institutional Hierarchy
Educational institutions rank your intellectual value through grades and credentials. Healthcare systems triage your treatment priority based on insurance coverage and perceived social value. Legal systems assign different justice outcomes based on your ability to afford adequate representation.
These aren’t neutral measurement systems—they’re value assignment mechanisms that serve institutional interests while disguising themselves as objective assessment tools.
The student who doesn’t perform well within the narrow confines of standardized testing isn’t less intelligent—they’re simply poorly aligned with the specific value framework the educational institution has chosen to prioritize.
──── Geographic Value Variation
Your life is worth different amounts depending on where you live. Not just economically—though cost of living adjustments are one manifestation—but in terms of actual social valuation.
A death in certain neighborhoods receives extensive media coverage and police investigation. A death in other neighborhoods becomes a statistic. Emergency response times vary by area. Infrastructure investment follows patterns that reflect implicit value hierarchies.
This geographic valuation isn’t based on inherent human worth—it’s based on economic and political leverage.
──── The Productivity Paradigm
Modern society has largely accepted the premise that human value correlates with productive output. If you’re not generating measurable economic value, your social worth diminishes.
This framework automatically devalues children, elderly people, disabled individuals, caregivers, artists, and anyone whose contributions don’t translate easily into quantifiable metrics.
The perversity becomes clear when you realize that this productivity-based valuation system often inversely correlates with actual human benefit. Many of the most economically “valuable” activities—financial speculation, planned obsolescence, addiction-driven design—actively harm human flourishing.
──── The Metrics Fallacy
What gets measured becomes what gets valued. This seemingly neutral principle has profound implications for how human worth gets determined.
If schools measure test scores, teacher value gets tied to test score improvement. If hospitals measure patient throughput, medical care value gets tied to efficiency metrics. If employees are measured by hours worked, professional value gets tied to time spent rather than outcomes achieved.
The measurement framework predetermines the value hierarchy. And you have virtually no input into what frameworks get chosen.
──── Digital Surveillance Scoring
Your digital footprint generates continuous value assessments across multiple systems. Purchase history, browsing patterns, communication networks, location data—all feed into profiles that determine your eligibility for services, opportunities, and social connections.
These systems don’t just measure your existing value—they shape your future opportunities. Poor scores in one system create cascading effects across others, creating value spirals that become increasingly difficult to escape.
The algorithmic assessment becomes a self-fulfilling prophecy. Low scores lead to reduced opportunities, which lead to lower scores, which reinforce the initial valuation.
──── The Illusion of Self-Determination
The sophisticated part of this system is how it maintains the illusion that you control your own valuation. You’re told to “add value,” “invest in yourself,” “build your personal brand.”
But these directives always operate within frameworks you didn’t choose, optimizing for metrics you didn’t set, pursuing valuations determined by systems that benefit from your participation more than your success.
True self-determination would require the ability to reject the entire valuation framework—but that option isn’t meaningfully available within the existing system structure.
──── The Value Extraction Economy
Perhaps most importantly, these valuation systems aren’t designed to accurately assess your worth—they’re designed to extract maximum value from you while providing minimum compensation.
Dating apps profit from keeping you single and searching. Social media platforms profit from keeping you engaged and insecure. Financial systems profit from keeping you indebted and dependent. Employment systems profit from keeping you productive and replaceable.
Your assigned value in each system reflects not your actual worth, but your utility to the system’s profit extraction mechanisms.
──── Recognition Without Resistance
Recognizing this dynamic doesn’t necessarily lead to viable resistance strategies. The systems are too interconnected, too essential for basic social functioning, too deeply embedded in the infrastructure of modern life.
But recognition does allow for a different relationship with external valuation. When you understand that your worth assignment is primarily a function of institutional interests rather than inherent value, you can begin to develop psychological independence from those assessments.
This isn’t a call to reject all social systems—that’s neither possible nor necessarily desirable. It’s a call to understand what these systems actually do versus what they claim to do.
Your life has worth that exists independently of any external measurement. The challenge is maintaining that understanding while operating within systems designed to convince you otherwise.
────────────────────────────────────────
The value assignment process is invisible precisely because it’s so pervasive. Once you begin to see it, you realize that almost every social interaction involves some form of worth calculation—and that these calculations serve specific institutional interests rather than universal human benefit.
The question isn’t how to escape this system, but how to maintain your sense of inherent worth while navigating systems designed to commodify it.