We mistake price for value in everything
The most devastating intellectual error of our time is the systematic confusion between price and value. This isn’t merely an economic misunderstanding—it’s a civilizational pathology that corrupts every domain of human judgment.
──── The Great Substitution
Price is what you pay. Value is what something is worth. These should be distinct categories, yet modern society has collapsed them into a single measurement system.
When housing prices rise, we say property has become “more valuable.” When stock prices fall, we declare companies “less valuable.” When wages stagnate, we conclude workers have “lost value.”
This linguistic slippage reveals conceptual confusion. We’ve outsourced value assessment to market mechanisms that were never designed to measure worth—only to facilitate exchange.
The result is a world where price becomes the universal translator for all forms of significance.
──── Market Colonization of Meaning
Markets excel at price discovery for tradeable goods. They fail catastrophically at value assessment for everything else.
Yet we apply market logic everywhere: education becomes human capital investment, relationships become cost-benefit analyses, time becomes billable hours, attention becomes monetizable engagement, creativity becomes intellectual property.
Each domain adopts pricing mechanisms unsuited to its essential nature. Universities rank by tuition fees and graduate salaries. Dating apps optimize for user retention and premium subscriptions. Art markets determine cultural significance through auction results.
The market doesn’t just price these domains—it fundamentally restructures them according to pricing logic.
──── The Measurement Problem
Price appears objective because it involves numbers. Value assessment requires judgment, which feels subjective and unreliable.
This creates a cognitive bias toward quantification. We prefer bad measurements to no measurements. We’d rather have precise answers to wrong questions than imprecise answers to right questions.
Consider healthcare. Medical interventions are evaluated primarily by cost-effectiveness ratios. But the value of health can’t be reduced to quality-adjusted life years or treatment costs. The reduction is necessary for insurance calculations, but disastrous for medical philosophy.
We mistake the map for the territory, the measurement for the thing measured.
──── Algorithmic Price Discovery
Digital platforms have accelerated price-value confusion through algorithmic optimization.
Social media engagement metrics determine content “value.” Search rankings decide information “worth.” Recommendation algorithms shape cultural “importance.” Dating apps calculate romantic “matches.”
These systems optimize for behavioral responses that generate revenue, not for the underlying values they claim to measure. But their mathematical precision gives them authority. We defer to the algorithm’s assessment of worth.
The result is value systems designed by optimization engineers rather than moral philosophers.
──── The Authentic Value Illusion
Market participants often believe they’re expressing authentic values through purchasing decisions. This is the consumer sovereignty myth—that aggregated individual choices reveal true social preferences.
But markets only capture preferences that can be expressed through monetary transactions. They systematically exclude values that can’t or won’t be commodified: dignity, justice, beauty, meaning, community, tradition.
Moreover, purchasing power determines whose values get counted. The wealthy have proportionally more “votes” in market-based value discovery.
We mistake purchasing patterns for authentic value expression, when they’re actually wealth distribution patterns in disguise.
──── Educational Capture
The education system has been comprehensively captured by price-value confusion.
Universities are evaluated by return on investment. Academic programs are judged by graduate earning potential. Research is measured by grant funding and commercial applications. Student worth is calculated through debt-to-income ratios.
This creates systematic bias against knowledge domains that don’t translate easily into market value: philosophy, history, literature, pure mathematics, basic science.
The result is educational institutions that optimize for employment outcomes rather than intellectual development, producing graduates who confuse credentials with competence and salaries with significance.
──── Relationship Commodification
Even intimate relationships succumb to pricing logic.
Dating apps reduce compatibility to algorithmic matching scores. Marriage markets emerge where partners are evaluated by earning potential, social status, and physical appearance metrics. Divorce settlements financialize emotional bonds.
The language of relationship advice increasingly mirrors business strategy: personal branding, market positioning, competitive advantage, return on emotional investment.
We’re training an entire generation to approach love through spreadsheet logic.
──── The Commons Problem
Price-value confusion systematically undervalues commons—shared resources that benefit everyone but belong to no one.
Clean air, stable climate, biodiversity, cultural traditions, public spaces, social trust, institutional legitimacy. These have immense value but limited market price.
Because they can’t be easily commodified, they’re systematically neglected in cost-benefit analyses. Their destruction is treated as “negative externalities”—accounting footnotes rather than catastrophic value loss.
We’re liquidating invaluable commons to generate measurable profits.
──── Technological Amplification
Digital technology amplifies price-value confusion through datafication and metrics optimization.
Everything becomes trackable: steps, heartbeats, sleep cycles, productivity scores, social influence ratings, credit scores, recommendation engine inputs.
The quantified self movement promises self-knowledge through self-measurement. But metrics shape behavior in ways that often contradict the values they claim to measure.
Students optimize for test scores rather than learning. Workers optimize for performance metrics rather than meaningful contribution. Social media users optimize for engagement rather than authentic expression.
We’re creating elaborate measurement systems that systematically corrupt the values they attempt to capture.
──── Resistance Strategies
Individual resistance to price-value confusion requires conscious practice of independent value assessment.
This means asking different questions: What matters here, regardless of price? What can’t be bought or sold? What would I value if money didn’t exist? What do I care about that markets ignore?
It requires cultivating appreciation for unpriced goods: friendship, beauty, tranquility, understanding, justice, dignity, meaning.
It demands skepticism toward algorithmic value assignments and market-based rankings.
──── Institutional Alternatives
Systemic change requires institutions that operate on non-market value systems.
Libraries that prioritize access over profit. Universities that pursue knowledge over employment outcomes. Healthcare systems that optimize for health over cost-effectiveness. Political systems that represent values over purchasing power.
These institutions must actively resist market colonization while demonstrating alternative value assessment methods.
──── The Recognition Problem
The deeper issue is that we’ve lost the cognitive capacity to recognize value independent of price.
Generations raised in market-dominated societies struggle to imagine non-market value systems. We lack the conceptual vocabulary and practical experience necessary for alternative value assessment.
This is why price-value confusion feels natural rather than pathological. We’ve been trained from birth to equate worth with cost.
──── Recovery Requires Practice
Recovering the distinction between price and value requires deliberate practice, like rehabilitating an injured muscle.
We must repeatedly ask: What is this really worth, beyond what it costs? What matters here that can’t be bought? What would we value in a world without money?
These questions feel abstract because we’re out of practice. But they’re essential for developing value judgment independent of market signals.
────────────────────────────────────────
The price-value confusion isn’t just an intellectual error—it’s a systematic corruption of human judgment that distorts every domain of social life.
Recognition is the first step toward recovery. The second is practice: deliberately cultivating value assessment independent of pricing mechanisms.
The third is institutional: building systems that operate on non-market value principles.
Without this work, we’ll continue mistaking the price tag for the thing itself, living in a world where everything has a cost but nothing has meaning.